NEWS

Archive for March, 2008

Magnetic tattoos? Can they be removed with a magnet?

Friday, March 21st, 2008

Although Freedom-2 Ink is currently generating the most excitement for instantly removable tattoo inks, not that long ago, it was magnetic ink that seemed to hold this promise. Just a few years ago, a tattoo ink composed of magnetite granules (magnetic iron granules) was developed with the idea that ink could be manipulated or extracted after it was tattooed into the skin. It was thought that a powerful magnet could be used to move the granules around within the skin and to create new designs this way. It was also thought that either with or without a laser treatment, the granules could be pulled right out of the skin.

Using laser tattoo removal with magnetic tattoo ink was actually studied in animals and the results were published in 2002. The magnet had no effect on lightening the tattoo when used by itself. When a q-switched laser was applied first, ink was noted to be pulled into the upper dermis layers with the magnet. This was actuall found to darken rather than lighten the tattoo.

The idea seemed promising and may get resurrected one day when a new complementary technology comes along. In the meantime, magnetic ink does not appear to have delivered on its earlier promises. We’ll have to wait and see if newer high-tech inks, such as Freedom-2, will make good on their promises. For now standard q-switched laser tattoo treatment is the best available choice for fading or removing a tattoo.

Radiesse is Superior to Hyaluronic Acid for Wrinkles!

Sunday, March 16th, 2008
As reported in the February 2008 issue of Dermatologic Surgery, a study involving 60 patients compared the effects of calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) versus stabilized hyaluronic acid (Juvederm, Restylane) for the treatement of nasolabial folds. The study was randomized and split-face, that is, one side received the hylauronic acid and the other side the radiesse. Patients were re-evaluated and 6, 9, and 12 months by an observer that did not know which side had received which treatment. The results were strongly in favor of Radiesse. At 12 months, 79% of treated folds were still improved vs. only 43% of hyaluronic acid folds. Both evaluators and patients preferred the Radiesse side two to one over the hyaluronic acid side.

Another study in the February 2007 issue of the Journal of Academic Dermatology also reported long-lasting correction of nasolabial folds with Radiesse. Among patients that had previously received hyaluronic acid injections, such as Restylane, Radiesse was preferred due to long-lasting effects and more cosmetically pleasing correction. Radiesse was well-tolerated and had no significant adverse effects in the study.

Of note, hyaluronic acids, such as Juvederm, are still the preferred injection material for lip augmentation. Calcium hydroxylapatite is know to sometimes cause small nodules under the skin that could be more easily visible under thin lip skin. This is not a significant issue when injecting in the thicker skin of the rest of the face.